<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1147 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT-[LB]</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790078</link>
    <description>No vested right exists to seek conversion of non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants in economic-offence or serious-offence cases; such relief depends on the facts and circumstances of each matter. The cited earlier decisions were treated as fact-specific orders based on the nature of the allegations, the accused&#039;s role, and the manner in which warrants were issued or relief granted. Because those decisions did not settle any general legal proposition, they did not create a conflict of views requiring larger-bench determination. The referred question was therefore not answered on the merits, and the matter was left for decision by the Single Judge on its own facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1147 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT-[LB]</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790078</link>
      <description>No vested right exists to seek conversion of non-bailable warrants into bailable warrants in economic-offence or serious-offence cases; such relief depends on the facts and circumstances of each matter. The cited earlier decisions were treated as fact-specific orders based on the nature of the allegations, the accused&#039;s role, and the manner in which warrants were issued or relief granted. Because those decisions did not settle any general legal proposition, they did not create a conflict of views requiring larger-bench determination. The referred question was therefore not answered on the merits, and the matter was left for decision by the Single Judge on its own facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>