<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 230 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51248</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit made as a statutory condition for appeal under the Central Excise Act is refundable once the appeal succeeds, because it is not a duty payment and limitation or unjust enrichment does not apply. The refund rejection was therefore unsustainable and was set aside. A lower authority cannot question or refuse to implement a binding appellate order by treating compliance as premature or by sitting in appeal over its correctness; such refusal is without jurisdiction and contrary to judicial discipline. The Tribunal&#039;s power to secure compliance with its orders was recognised, and directions were issued for implementation and immediate refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 230 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51248</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit made as a statutory condition for appeal under the Central Excise Act is refundable once the appeal succeeds, because it is not a duty payment and limitation or unjust enrichment does not apply. The refund rejection was therefore unsustainable and was set aside. A lower authority cannot question or refuse to implement a binding appellate order by treating compliance as premature or by sitting in appeal over its correctness; such refusal is without jurisdiction and contrary to judicial discipline. The Tribunal&#039;s power to secure compliance with its orders was recognised, and directions were issued for implementation and immediate refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>