https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790081 Bail was granted in a prosecution under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 because the alleged offences were punishable up to five years and triable by a Magistrate, the prosecution report had already been filed, and the petitioner had remained in custody since 17.10.2025. The court also noted that the petitioner was a woman working as a data entry operator in the office of the principal accused. On these facts, continued detention was not warranted and bail was considered appropriate. en-us Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Apr 2026 08:22:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790081 Bail was granted in a prosecution under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017 because the alleged offences were punishable up to five years and triable by a Magistrate, the prosecution report had already been filed, and the petitioner had remained in custody since 17.10.2025. The court also noted that the petitioner was a woman working as a data entry operator in the office of the principal accused. On these facts, continued detention was not warranted and bail was considered appropriate. Case-Laws GST Wed, 15 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=790081