https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468143 Seized documents were required to be released where no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days from confirmation of retention, and no stay barred consideration by the Tribunal. The closure of the predicate complaint had already been accepted by the Magistrate, and the pending SLP on investigation did not suspend the Tribunal proceedings. As sufficient time had elapsed after seizure to initiate the complaint, the Tribunal directed release of the documents to the appellants within six weeks, while allowing the respondent to obtain and authenticate copies before release. en-us Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:39:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468143 Seized documents were required to be released where no prosecution complaint was filed within 365 days from confirmation of retention, and no stay barred consideration by the Tribunal. The closure of the predicate complaint had already been accepted by the Magistrate, and the pending SLP on investigation did not suspend the Tribunal proceedings. As sufficient time had elapsed after seizure to initiate the complaint, the Tribunal directed release of the documents to the appellants within six weeks, while allowing the respondent to obtain and authenticate copies before release. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468143