<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 118 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51246</link>
    <description>CT-3 clearances of EPABX systems to a 100% Export Oriented Unit fell within the exemption scheme under Notification No. 123/81-C.E. The notification placed responsibility for accounting for goods and pursuing recovery for unaccounted utilisation on the officer in charge of the consignee EOU. In the absence of evidence showing how the systems were used, the prescribed mechanism still required action against the consignee through its proper officer rather than a duty demand against the manufacturer-consignor. The demand against the manufacturer was therefore set aside, and the appeal challenging that outcome failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:17:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 118 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51246</link>
      <description>CT-3 clearances of EPABX systems to a 100% Export Oriented Unit fell within the exemption scheme under Notification No. 123/81-C.E. The notification placed responsibility for accounting for goods and pursuing recovery for unaccounted utilisation on the officer in charge of the consignee EOU. In the absence of evidence showing how the systems were used, the prescribed mechanism still required action against the consignee through its proper officer rather than a duty demand against the manufacturer-consignor. The demand against the manufacturer was therefore set aside, and the appeal challenging that outcome failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>