<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2068 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468153</link>
    <description>Statutory deduction under Section 10A cannot be denied merely because the assessee earlier adopted a different position in its returns, as estoppel does not operate against a statutory entitlement. The deduction, however, depends on satisfaction of the statutory prerequisites, and on the facts the concurrent findings that the 31 locations were expansions of existing units, not separate undertakings, were upheld. The revised return claiming enhanced deduction therefore failed on the factual basis that the Section 10A conditions were not met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2068 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468153</link>
      <description>Statutory deduction under Section 10A cannot be denied merely because the assessee earlier adopted a different position in its returns, as estoppel does not operate against a statutory entitlement. The deduction, however, depends on satisfaction of the statutory prerequisites, and on the facts the concurrent findings that the 31 locations were expansions of existing units, not separate undertakings, were upheld. The revised return claiming enhanced deduction therefore failed on the factual basis that the Section 10A conditions were not met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>