https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468136 In a commercial-quantity NDPS prosecution, bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered against the restrictions in Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Material gathered before the conclusion of the earlier Section 319 CrPC proceedings was held irrelevant for the bail assessment, so the court examined only the later material, including call records, financial trail and a co-accused's disclosure statement. On that available material, the evidence was not strong enough to negate the accused's claim at the bail stage. The court held that the twin Section 37 requirements must be tested on legally relevant material and that stringent conditions can be imposed to prevent misuse of liberty, and granted bail. en-us Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 18:33:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468136 In a commercial-quantity NDPS prosecution, bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered against the restrictions in Section 37 of the NDPS Act. Material gathered before the conclusion of the earlier Section 319 CrPC proceedings was held irrelevant for the bail assessment, so the court examined only the later material, including call records, financial trail and a co-accused's disclosure statement. On that available material, the evidence was not strong enough to negate the accused's claim at the bail stage. The court held that the twin Section 37 requirements must be tested on legally relevant material and that stringent conditions can be imposed to prevent misuse of liberty, and granted bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468136