<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1548 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468135</link>
    <description>Further investigation was permissible where the FIR investigation remained open and the police had collected fresh material beyond the evidence led in the first trial. The Court distinguished proceedings under Section 319 CrPC from the investigating agency&#039;s separate power to continue investigation, and held that the earlier Constitution Bench ruling did not bar further investigation or confer any clean chit on the petitioner. As the fresh material was sufficient to support the arrest, the challenge that the arrest and continuing investigation violated the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier orders failed, and the writ relief was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:33:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1548 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468135</link>
      <description>Further investigation was permissible where the FIR investigation remained open and the police had collected fresh material beyond the evidence led in the first trial. The Court distinguished proceedings under Section 319 CrPC from the investigating agency&#039;s separate power to continue investigation, and held that the earlier Constitution Bench ruling did not bar further investigation or confer any clean chit on the petitioner. As the fresh material was sufficient to support the arrest, the challenge that the arrest and continuing investigation violated the Supreme Court&#039;s earlier orders failed, and the writ relief was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>