<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 114 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interest under Section 11AB is not payable when duty is voluntarily paid upon acceptance of an increased price by the buyer, and there is no suppression of facts by the assessee in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:02:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 114 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that interest under Section 11AB is not payable when duty is voluntarily paid upon acceptance of an increased price by the buyer, and there is no suppression of facts by the assessee in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>