https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789995 A writ court will not intervene against a finalized GST demand where the taxpayer was served with the demand order, did not file an appeal, and instead pursued rectification before approaching the court after attachment of the bank account. The plea of non-communication and lack of knowledge was found unconvincing because the taxpayer retained GST registration and was obliged to file periodic and annual returns. Relief was refused, and the challenge to the demand and consequential attachment failed. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 10:34:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789995 A writ court will not intervene against a finalized GST demand where the taxpayer was served with the demand order, did not file an appeal, and instead pursued rectification before approaching the court after attachment of the bank account. The plea of non-communication and lack of knowledge was found unconvincing because the taxpayer retained GST registration and was obliged to file periodic and annual returns. Relief was refused, and the challenge to the demand and consequential attachment failed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789995