<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1003 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789934</link>
    <description>Only consideration flowing to the service provider for the taxable service can be included in service tax valuation. Excavation and processing work was undertaken for a fixed rate per metric tonne, and service tax had already been paid on that consideration. The processed material was separately sold by the service recipient to a sister concern on excise invoices with excise duty paid, so the recipient&#039;s trading income could not be treated as extra consideration for the appellant&#039;s services. In the absence of a direct nexus between that third-party sale and the service transaction, and to avoid impermissible double taxation, the proposed addition to taxable value was unsustainable and the demand, interest, and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1003 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789934</link>
      <description>Only consideration flowing to the service provider for the taxable service can be included in service tax valuation. Excavation and processing work was undertaken for a fixed rate per metric tonne, and service tax had already been paid on that consideration. The processed material was separately sold by the service recipient to a sister concern on excise invoices with excise duty paid, so the recipient&#039;s trading income could not be treated as extra consideration for the appellant&#039;s services. In the absence of a direct nexus between that third-party sale and the service transaction, and to avoid impermissible double taxation, the proposed addition to taxable value was unsustainable and the demand, interest, and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>