<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1008 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789939</link>
    <description>An appellate forum will not disturb a reasoned interim order preserving status quo in shareholding, directorship, and bank account operations where the order is designed to protect the subject matter of the lis pending adjudication. The tribunal noted that the protective arrangement was meant to prevent prejudice arising from rival allegations over management and alleged diversion of funds, and that the earlier protective order had not been challenged. On that basis, no clear error or prejudice was shown, so interference was declined and the interim protection was allowed to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1008 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789939</link>
      <description>An appellate forum will not disturb a reasoned interim order preserving status quo in shareholding, directorship, and bank account operations where the order is designed to protect the subject matter of the lis pending adjudication. The tribunal noted that the protective arrangement was meant to prevent prejudice arising from rival allegations over management and alleged diversion of funds, and that the earlier protective order had not been challenged. On that basis, no clear error or prejudice was shown, so interference was declined and the interim protection was allowed to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>