https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789940 In an appeal under the Companies Act, 1956, interference is confined to questions of law and perverse findings, and a continuing course of oppression is not defeated by delay and laches. The Company Law Board could return findings on fraud and forgery on clear documentary material within summary company jurisdiction, and those findings on shareholding, oppression and mismanagement were not shown to be unsupported by evidence or arbitrary. Additional evidence in appeal was refused because the requirements of Order XLI Rule 27 CPC were not met. The special auditor's appointment was sustained as a consequential measure and not an impermissible basis for the main relief. en-us Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789940 In an appeal under the Companies Act, 1956, interference is confined to questions of law and perverse findings, and a continuing course of oppression is not defeated by delay and laches. The Company Law Board could return findings on fraud and forgery on clear documentary material within summary company jurisdiction, and those findings on shareholding, oppression and mismanagement were not shown to be unsupported by evidence or arbitrary. Additional evidence in appeal was refused because the requirements of Order XLI Rule 27 CPC were not met. The special auditor's appointment was sustained as a consequential measure and not an impermissible basis for the main relief. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789940