<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1041 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789972</link>
    <description>Proceedings under Section 153C require a satisfaction note as a sine qua non, and where it is recorded only after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment, it must be prepared immediately thereafter. &quot;Immediately&quot; requires temporal proximity, not merely action within a reasonable period, and the CBDT circular applies that principle to Section 153C. On these facts, the searched persons&#039; assessments ended in September 2022, but satisfaction was recorded only in July 2024, creating a delay of about 21 months. That delay was not curable by a later satisfaction note from the other person&#039;s Assessing Officer, so the Section 153C notices and consequential orders were barred by limitation and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1041 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789972</link>
      <description>Proceedings under Section 153C require a satisfaction note as a sine qua non, and where it is recorded only after completion of the searched person&#039;s assessment, it must be prepared immediately thereafter. &quot;Immediately&quot; requires temporal proximity, not merely action within a reasonable period, and the CBDT circular applies that principle to Section 153C. On these facts, the searched persons&#039; assessments ended in September 2022, but satisfaction was recorded only in July 2024, creating a delay of about 21 months. That delay was not curable by a later satisfaction note from the other person&#039;s Assessing Officer, so the Section 153C notices and consequential orders were barred by limitation and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>