<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1045 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789976</link>
    <description>An unsigned GST assessment order is invalid because the assessing officer&#039;s signature is not a dispensable formality, and the curative provisions in Sections 160 and 169 of the CGST Act do not validate such a defect. Rule 26(3) of the CGST Rules also means an order without signature is not validly served. The Court further held that delay in challenging the order could not defeat relief because there was no lawful service of the impugned order. The assessment was set aside, with liberty to pass a fresh order after due notice and signature, and the intervening period was excluded for limitation purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1045 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789976</link>
      <description>An unsigned GST assessment order is invalid because the assessing officer&#039;s signature is not a dispensable formality, and the curative provisions in Sections 160 and 169 of the CGST Act do not validate such a defect. Rule 26(3) of the CGST Rules also means an order without signature is not validly served. The Court further held that delay in challenging the order could not defeat relief because there was no lawful service of the impugned order. The assessment was set aside, with liberty to pass a fresh order after due notice and signature, and the intervening period was excluded for limitation purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>