https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789980 Where an adjudication order shows that the proper officer considered the taxpayer's replies, written submissions and supporting material on classification, exemption and valuation, writ interference under Article 226 is ordinarily unwarranted if an efficacious statutory appeal is available. The High Court held that the petitioner could raise all factual and legal grounds before the appellate authority and declined to examine the demand on merits in writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789980 Where an adjudication order shows that the proper officer considered the taxpayer's replies, written submissions and supporting material on classification, exemption and valuation, writ interference under Article 226 is ordinarily unwarranted if an efficacious statutory appeal is available. The High Court held that the petitioner could raise all factual and legal grounds before the appellate authority and declined to examine the demand on merits in writ jurisdiction. The writ petition was therefore not entertained and was dismissed, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal. Case-Laws GST Wed, 18 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789980