https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994 The SLP was not entertained because the High Court decision relied upon in the impugned order had already been tested in Union of India v. Patson Papers Pvt. Ltd., and the connected SLPs against that decision had been dismissed on 27.10.2025. In that circumstance, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the present special leave petition and dismissed it. Pending applications were also disposed of. en-us Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994 The SLP was not entertained because the High Court decision relied upon in the impugned order had already been tested in Union of India v. Patson Papers Pvt. Ltd., and the connected SLPs against that decision had been dismissed on 27.10.2025. In that circumstance, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the present special leave petition and dismissed it. Pending applications were also disposed of. Case-Laws GST Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994