<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 1063 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition because the High Court decision relied on the earlier Patson Papers ruling, and the SLPs against that ruling had already been dismissed. The special leave petition was accordingly dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 1063 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to entertain the special leave petition because the High Court decision relied on the earlier Patson Papers ruling, and the SLPs against that ruling had already been dismissed. The special leave petition was accordingly dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>