<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 79 recovery notice upheld where the proper officer acted and no separate prior notice was required after final assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98899</link>
    <description>Section 79 permits recovery of tax dues from third parties without any separate statutory requirement of prior authorization before recovery proceedings are initiated. The High Court found that the jurisdictional Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST) was the notified proper officer under the Gazette notification, so the notice could not be challenged for want of competence. It also held that once the assessment order had attained finality, no further prior notice to the dealer was required before issuing a garnishee notice to the bank. The recovery notice was therefore lawful and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 79 recovery notice upheld where the proper officer acted and no separate prior notice was required after final assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98899</link>
      <description>Section 79 permits recovery of tax dues from third parties without any separate statutory requirement of prior authorization before recovery proceedings are initiated. The High Court found that the jurisdictional Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST) was the notified proper officer under the Gazette notification, so the notice could not be challenged for want of competence. It also held that once the assessment order had attained finality, no further prior notice to the dealer was required before issuing a garnishee notice to the bank. The recovery notice was therefore lawful and the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>