<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment notice invalid for short response time, limitation breach, and unsustainable addition on joint property ownership.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98883</link>
    <description>Section 148A(b) requires at least seven days to respond; a notice granting only five days was held contrary to statute, and the assessee&#039;s later extension request did not cure the defect. The resulting order under section 148A(d) and reassessment were therefore unsustainable. The notice under section 148 was also time-barred, as the limitation for A.Y. 2015-16 expired on 31/03/2022 but the notice was issued on 04/04/2022. On merits, the addition for unexplained investment could not be made wholly in the assessee&#039;s hands because the sale deed showed joint ownership of the property with his wife.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment notice invalid for short response time, limitation breach, and unsustainable addition on joint property ownership.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98883</link>
      <description>Section 148A(b) requires at least seven days to respond; a notice granting only five days was held contrary to statute, and the assessee&#039;s later extension request did not cure the defect. The resulting order under section 148A(d) and reassessment were therefore unsustainable. The notice under section 148 was also time-barred, as the limitation for A.Y. 2015-16 expired on 31/03/2022 but the notice was issued on 04/04/2022. On merits, the addition for unexplained investment could not be made wholly in the assessee&#039;s hands because the sale deed showed joint ownership of the property with his wife.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:21:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>