<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2106 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468103</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was held not entertainable because the tax effect was below the CBIC circular&#039;s monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for pursuing such matters. The tax effect was Rs. 23.96 lakhs, and no stated exception to the circular applied. The appeal was therefore dismissed on the ground of low tax effect, leaving the substantial questions of law open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2106 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468103</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was held not entertainable because the tax effect was below the CBIC circular&#039;s monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakhs for pursuing such matters. The tax effect was Rs. 23.96 lakhs, and no stated exception to the circular applied. The appeal was therefore dismissed on the ground of low tax effect, leaving the substantial questions of law open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>