https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468102 A writ petition sought only a direction to the competent authority to decide the petitioner's refund representations for tax paid after GST was introduced. The State did not oppose the request and stated that the representations would be examined in accordance with law at the earliest. The court therefore directed the competent authority to decide the pending refund representations within a specified time, and to afford a hearing if required. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 16:05:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468102 A writ petition sought only a direction to the competent authority to decide the petitioner's refund representations for tax paid after GST was introduced. The State did not oppose the request and stated that the representations would be examined in accordance with law at the earliest. The court therefore directed the competent authority to decide the pending refund representations within a specified time, and to afford a hearing if required. Case-Laws GST Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468102