<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mandatory Refunds under ADD Rules: CESTAT Mumbai Clarifies Scope of Unjust Enrichment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16214</link>
    <description>Mandatory refund of provisional anti-dumping duty under Rule 21(3) of the ADD Rules is described as a self-executing statutory obligation, so the refund mechanism does not depend on a separate importer application and the unjust enrichment test under Section 11B cannot be imported to defeat a refund that the Rules themselves direct. The article further states that accounting treatment of duty as &quot;expenditure&quot; rather than as a &quot;receivable&quot; does not by itself establish pass-through, and that a chartered accountant&#039;s certificate of non-passing of duty incidence is valid evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=897018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Mandatory Refunds under ADD Rules: CESTAT Mumbai Clarifies Scope of Unjust Enrichment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16214</link>
      <description>Mandatory refund of provisional anti-dumping duty under Rule 21(3) of the ADD Rules is described as a self-executing statutory obligation, so the refund mechanism does not depend on a separate importer application and the unjust enrichment test under Section 11B cannot be imported to defeat a refund that the Rules themselves direct. The article further states that accounting treatment of duty as &quot;expenditure&quot; rather than as a &quot;receivable&quot; does not by itself establish pass-through, and that a chartered accountant&#039;s certificate of non-passing of duty incidence is valid evidence.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Customs - Import - Export - SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 08:34:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>