https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51221 Processed knitted pile fabric received in running length and subjected to washing, dyeing, bleaching, hydro-extraction, tumble dyeing and drying raised a classification dispute between Chapter 63 as a made-up textile article and Chapter 60 as processed fabric. The question turned on the scope of Note 5(b) and Note 5(f) of Section XI, with conflicting Tribunal views on their application to the processed material. Because of that divergence, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for consideration. en-us Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:24:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51221 Processed knitted pile fabric received in running length and subjected to washing, dyeing, bleaching, hydro-extraction, tumble dyeing and drying raised a classification dispute between Chapter 63 as a made-up textile article and Chapter 60 as processed fabric. The question turned on the scope of Note 5(b) and Note 5(f) of Section XI, with conflicting Tribunal views on their application to the processed material. Because of that divergence, the matter was referred to a Larger Bench for consideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51221