<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 87 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51220</link>
    <description>The lower appellate authority allowed the refund claim by the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) for excess duty paid on PCC poles, finding it within the statutory limitation period. The unjust enrichment clause was deemed inapplicable as the goods were cleared by MPEB for their own use, not to any other person. Since no sale occurred when the goods were cleared to MPEB&#039;s project sites, the presumption under Section 12B of the Central Excise Act did not apply. The claim was upheld, and the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:23:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 87 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51220</link>
      <description>The lower appellate authority allowed the refund claim by the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board (MPEB) for excess duty paid on PCC poles, finding it within the statutory limitation period. The unjust enrichment clause was deemed inapplicable as the goods were cleared by MPEB for their own use, not to any other person. Since no sale occurred when the goods were cleared to MPEB&#039;s project sites, the presumption under Section 12B of the Central Excise Act did not apply. The claim was upheld, and the appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>