https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468068 A clear and consistent chain of title supported by registered documents, earlier ownership records and site particulars will displace a later disputed transaction for PMLA purposes. On the facts, Urmil Gupta established lawful title to plot no. 47 because her sale deed was traced through prior conveyances and matching boundary details, so the property was excluded from restraint. Mahavir Singh Saini, however, did not prove completed ownership in plots no. 47 and 48: the agreements to sell were unsupported by full payment, a sale deed, or proof of how title passed to his vendors, so his claim failed and no relief was granted against attachment or freezing. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2026 20:22:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468068 A clear and consistent chain of title supported by registered documents, earlier ownership records and site particulars will displace a later disputed transaction for PMLA purposes. On the facts, Urmil Gupta established lawful title to plot no. 47 because her sale deed was traced through prior conveyances and matching boundary details, so the property was excluded from restraint. Mahavir Singh Saini, however, did not prove completed ownership in plots no. 47 and 48: the agreements to sell were unsupported by full payment, a sale deed, or proof of how title passed to his vendors, so his claim failed and no relief was granted against attachment or freezing. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468068