<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1752 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468085</link>
    <description>In concluded assessments under section 153C, additions cannot be sustained unless search material reveals incriminating evidence pertaining to the assessee for the relevant years; documents already forming part of the regular record do not provide that jurisdictional basis, so the 153C proceedings fail. On the cash-credit issue, an assessee discharges the section 68 onus by producing documents showing the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness, including PAN, financial statements, confirmations, bank records and the transaction agreement. Where the funds move through banking channels and the Revenue does not rebut the evidence with reliable material, additions for advances or investments are not justified and the relief granted by the first appellate authority is sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 11:03:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1752 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468085</link>
      <description>In concluded assessments under section 153C, additions cannot be sustained unless search material reveals incriminating evidence pertaining to the assessee for the relevant years; documents already forming part of the regular record do not provide that jurisdictional basis, so the 153C proceedings fail. On the cash-credit issue, an assessee discharges the section 68 onus by producing documents showing the investors&#039; identity, creditworthiness and transaction genuineness, including PAN, financial statements, confirmations, bank records and the transaction agreement. Where the funds move through banking channels and the Revenue does not rebut the evidence with reliable material, additions for advances or investments are not justified and the relief granted by the first appellate authority is sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>