<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1050 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468065</link>
    <description>Income relating to disputed electricity bills was not taxable as accrued income where the Gujarat Electricity Board had not admitted the bills and the assessee did not dispute that position. The fact that the amount had been shown in the original return did not by itself create accrual. The corresponding electricity expenditure was also allowable on commercial principles, and its deductibility did not depend solely on its treatment in the books. On these facts, the addition and disallowance relating to the disputed electricity-bill amount were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 17:32:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1050 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468065</link>
      <description>Income relating to disputed electricity bills was not taxable as accrued income where the Gujarat Electricity Board had not admitted the bills and the assessee did not dispute that position. The fact that the amount had been shown in the original return did not by itself create accrual. The corresponding electricity expenditure was also allowable on commercial principles, and its deductibility did not depend solely on its treatment in the books. On these facts, the addition and disallowance relating to the disputed electricity-bill amount were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>