<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51206</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside duty and penalties for the Ghoorpur factory due to lack of evidence, while confirming duty and penalties for the Phoolpur factory based on evidence of clandestine removal. Penalties were reduced or set aside for appellants based on individual circumstances. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with duty and penalties upheld for the Phoolpur factory and dismissed for the Ghoorpur factory.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:57:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 219 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51206</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside duty and penalties for the Ghoorpur factory due to lack of evidence, while confirming duty and penalties for the Phoolpur factory based on evidence of clandestine removal. Penalties were reduced or set aside for appellants based on individual circumstances. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with duty and penalties upheld for the Phoolpur factory and dismissed for the Ghoorpur factory.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>