<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 877 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789808</link>
    <description>Once an interim resolution professional is appointed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, management of the corporate debtor vests in that professional, and a suspended director has no authority to file an appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name. An appeal instituted by such a director is incompetent from inception, not merely defective. The Code&#039;s limitation scheme permits only the prescribed filing period and a limited condonable extension, so an incompetent appeal cannot be cured by later amendment of the cause title after limitation has expired. The appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name was therefore not maintainable and was rightly dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 877 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789808</link>
      <description>Once an interim resolution professional is appointed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, management of the corporate debtor vests in that professional, and a suspended director has no authority to file an appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name. An appeal instituted by such a director is incompetent from inception, not merely defective. The Code&#039;s limitation scheme permits only the prescribed filing period and a limited condonable extension, so an incompetent appeal cannot be cured by later amendment of the cause title after limitation has expired. The appeal in the corporate debtor&#039;s name was therefore not maintainable and was rightly dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>