<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 108 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51203</link>
    <description>Eligibility under the Compounded Levy Scheme depended on whether investment in plant and machinery stayed within the prescribed ceiling under Notification No. 16/2001-C.E. (N.T.). A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate was rejected as based on an incorrect method, and the benefit was denied outright. The proper course, however, was to afford the assessee a fair opportunity to produce a certificate meeting the legal requirement and to have eligibility examined afresh. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration, with the eligibility question to be determined after allowing supporting evidence to be filed and assessed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 108 - CEGAT, COURT NO. IV, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51203</link>
      <description>Eligibility under the Compounded Levy Scheme depended on whether investment in plant and machinery stayed within the prescribed ceiling under Notification No. 16/2001-C.E. (N.T.). A Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate was rejected as based on an incorrect method, and the benefit was denied outright. The proper course, however, was to afford the assessee a fair opportunity to produce a certificate meeting the legal requirement and to have eligibility examined afresh. The matter was therefore remitted for de novo consideration, with the eligibility question to be determined after allowing supporting evidence to be filed and assessed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>