https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789859 Where an efficacious appellate remedy was available against a GST assessment order, the writ court permitted the assessee to pursue the statutory appeal instead of undertaking a merits determination of the tax liability. That appellate recourse was made conditional on deposit of 50% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time, and the appeal was to be considered on merits in accordance with law upon compliance. Further recovery under the impugned order was kept in abeyance so long as the pre-deposit and filing requirements were satisfied. en-us Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789859 Where an efficacious appellate remedy was available against a GST assessment order, the writ court permitted the assessee to pursue the statutory appeal instead of undertaking a merits determination of the tax liability. That appellate recourse was made conditional on deposit of 50% of the disputed tax within the stipulated time, and the appeal was to be considered on merits in accordance with law upon compliance. Further recovery under the impugned order was kept in abeyance so long as the pre-deposit and filing requirements were satisfied. Case-Laws GST Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789859