<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 939 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789870</link>
    <description>A writ challenge to a GST order was declined where the statutory framework provided a multi-tier appellate remedy. Although the petitioners raised a jurisdictional objection, the Court considered it appropriate to require them to pursue the appeal at the first instance rather than invoke writ jurisdiction directly. The petition was therefore not examined on merits, and the petitioners were relegated to the appellate authority with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 939 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789870</link>
      <description>A writ challenge to a GST order was declined where the statutory framework provided a multi-tier appellate remedy. Although the petitioners raised a jurisdictional objection, the Court considered it appropriate to require them to pursue the appeal at the first instance rather than invoke writ jurisdiction directly. The petition was therefore not examined on merits, and the petitioners were relegated to the appellate authority with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>