<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 940 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789871</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution because the case rested chiefly on documentary material, the complaint had already been filed, and the investigation was substantially complete. The Court found no demonstrated need for further custodial interrogation and no concrete basis to believe release would lead to tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. In these circumstances, continued custody was held unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 940 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789871</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a GST prosecution because the case rested chiefly on documentary material, the complaint had already been filed, and the investigation was substantially complete. The Court found no demonstrated need for further custodial interrogation and no concrete basis to believe release would lead to tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. In these circumstances, continued custody was held unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>