https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789872 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily declined where the CGST framework provides an efficacious statutory appeal, and the recognised exceptions remain limited to breach of fundamental rights, natural justice, excess of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires. A challenge to a corrigendum and the impugned order that requires scrutiny of the correction, the record, and disputed facts falls outside the narrow scope of certiorari review. As the statutory scheme permits an appeal against the adjudicating order, the writ petition was held not maintainable and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789872 Article 226 writ jurisdiction is ordinarily declined where the CGST framework provides an efficacious statutory appeal, and the recognised exceptions remain limited to breach of fundamental rights, natural justice, excess of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires. A challenge to a corrigendum and the impugned order that requires scrutiny of the correction, the record, and disputed facts falls outside the narrow scope of certiorari review. As the statutory scheme permits an appeal against the adjudicating order, the writ petition was held not maintainable and the petitioner was left to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws GST Mon, 13 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789872