<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty for capital gains exemption lapse deleted where full disclosure and timely deposit showed no concealment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98815</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee had disclosed the capital gains, deposited the sale proceeds in the Capital Gains Account Scheme within time, and retained the unutilised amount in that account. The Tribunal held that failure to use the full amount within the stipulated period, caused by disputes with the builder, did not by itself establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The assessee had also suo motu informed the AO before reassessment that the exemption period had expired and accepted the taxability of the balance. In the absence of deliberate suppression, the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty for capital gains exemption lapse deleted where full disclosure and timely deposit showed no concealment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98815</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable where the assessee had disclosed the capital gains, deposited the sale proceeds in the Capital Gains Account Scheme within time, and retained the unutilised amount in that account. The Tribunal held that failure to use the full amount within the stipulated period, caused by disputes with the builder, did not by itself establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The assessee had also suo motu informed the AO before reassessment that the exemption period had expired and accepted the taxability of the balance. In the absence of deliberate suppression, the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 09:05:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>