https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468041 Regular bail was declined in a serious excise and corruption conspiracy case because the record showed prima facie involvement of the applicant as a central conspirator, supported by witness statements and investigation material. The Court treated the gravity of the alleged economic offences, the public impact of the misconduct, and the risk of witness influence or evidence tampering as decisive against release. Parity with co-accused was rejected because the applicant's role was considered distinct and more culpable. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:12:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468041 Regular bail was declined in a serious excise and corruption conspiracy case because the record showed prima facie involvement of the applicant as a central conspirator, supported by witness statements and investigation material. The Court treated the gravity of the alleged economic offences, the public impact of the misconduct, and the risk of witness influence or evidence tampering as decisive against release. Parity with co-accused was rejected because the applicant's role was considered distinct and more culpable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468041