<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1707 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468044</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal held that a Section 9 insolvency application could not be rejected on the ground that no computation of operational debt was on record where the rejoinder contained the calculation statement and supporting particulars. It further clarified that invoices are not a mandatory pre-condition for maintainability if the debt is otherwise supported by relevant documents and the demand notice. As the finding on absence of computation was erroneous and the omission of invoices was not ative, the matter was sent back for fresh consideration on the full pleadings and evidence, and the company petition was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1707 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNALPRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468044</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal held that a Section 9 insolvency application could not be rejected on the ground that no computation of operational debt was on record where the rejoinder contained the calculation statement and supporting particulars. It further clarified that invoices are not a mandatory pre-condition for maintainability if the debt is otherwise supported by relevant documents and the demand notice. As the finding on absence of computation was erroneous and the omission of invoices was not ative, the matter was sent back for fresh consideration on the full pleadings and evidence, and the company petition was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>