<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 805 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789736</link>
    <description>Evidence collected in an income-tax search may be relied on in benami proceedings, and a separate independent enquiry is not required where the same material is used to test whether a benami arrangement exists. Retracted statements do not by themselves lose evidentiary value if supported by documentary and electronic records. Here, the Tribunal treated the search material, cash-routing statements, and electronic sheets as mutually corroborative, and found that unexplained fund movement, absence of genuine business activity, and routing of unaccounted cash through accommodation entries supported the benami finding. The provisional attachment was therefore confirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 805 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789736</link>
      <description>Evidence collected in an income-tax search may be relied on in benami proceedings, and a separate independent enquiry is not required where the same material is used to test whether a benami arrangement exists. Retracted statements do not by themselves lose evidentiary value if supported by documentary and electronic records. Here, the Tribunal treated the search material, cash-routing statements, and electronic sheets as mutually corroborative, and found that unexplained fund movement, absence of genuine business activity, and routing of unaccounted cash through accommodation entries supported the benami finding. The provisional attachment was therefore confirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>