<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 96 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51186</link>
    <description>Goods identified at the factory, inspected and marked for the buyer, and then handed to the carrier under contracts showing the seller as consignor and the buyer as consignee were treated as appropriated to the contract at dispatch. On that basis, property passed on delivery to the carrier, and deferred approval or payment clauses did not convert the transaction into a sale on approval or postpone transfer of title. Because the place of removal remained the factory gate, freight and transit insurance were not includible in the assessable value. The text states that the assessee&#039;s position was accepted on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 15:16:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 96 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51186</link>
      <description>Goods identified at the factory, inspected and marked for the buyer, and then handed to the carrier under contracts showing the seller as consignor and the buyer as consignee were treated as appropriated to the contract at dispatch. On that basis, property passed on delivery to the carrier, and deferred approval or payment clauses did not convert the transaction into a sale on approval or postpone transfer of title. Because the place of removal remained the factory gate, freight and transit insurance were not includible in the assessable value. The text states that the assessee&#039;s position was accepted on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>