<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 825 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789756</link>
    <description>Unsecured loan credits were found unsustainable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 where the assessee had produced confirmations, bank statements, income-tax returns, ledger accounts and proof of repayment through banking channels, along with tax deduction on interest. The addition was based mainly on the lenders&#039; low income and a general statement about entry providers, but the Revenue produced no direct or circumstantial evidence of a cash trail, return of the assessee&#039;s own money, or a proximate nexus with alleged accommodation entries. Once primary evidence was furnished, the burden shifted to the Revenue to rebut it with contrary material, which it failed to do; the additions and consequential disallowances were deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 825 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789756</link>
      <description>Unsecured loan credits were found unsustainable as unexplained cash credits under section 68 where the assessee had produced confirmations, bank statements, income-tax returns, ledger accounts and proof of repayment through banking channels, along with tax deduction on interest. The addition was based mainly on the lenders&#039; low income and a general statement about entry providers, but the Revenue produced no direct or circumstantial evidence of a cash trail, return of the assessee&#039;s own money, or a proximate nexus with alleged accommodation entries. Once primary evidence was furnished, the burden shifted to the Revenue to rebut it with contrary material, which it failed to do; the additions and consequential disallowances were deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>