<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789762</link>
    <description>Section 144C requires the Assessing Officer to complete the final assessment strictly in conformity with binding DRP directions, and a final order passed without giving effect to those directions is contrary to law. Where the assessment ignores the DRP&#039;s mandate and no rectification is made to cure the defect, the order remains invalid. The final assessment order was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 831 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789762</link>
      <description>Section 144C requires the Assessing Officer to complete the final assessment strictly in conformity with binding DRP directions, and a final order passed without giving effect to those directions is contrary to law. Where the assessment ignores the DRP&#039;s mandate and no rectification is made to cure the defect, the order remains invalid. The final assessment order was therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>