https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789779 Interference under Article 226 with reassessment notices or ongoing proceedings is ordinarily justified only where the action is shown to be without jurisdiction or fundamentally void. A mere challenge to the factual correctness of the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer, or to the accuracy of the figures forming the basis of the proceedings, does not by itself warrant writ intervention at that stage. The Supreme Court therefore found no ground to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the SLP. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 13:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789779 Interference under Article 226 with reassessment notices or ongoing proceedings is ordinarily justified only where the action is shown to be without jurisdiction or fundamentally void. A mere challenge to the factual correctness of the material relied upon by the Assessing Officer, or to the accuracy of the figures forming the basis of the proceedings, does not by itself warrant writ intervention at that stage. The Supreme Court therefore found no ground to interfere with the High Court's order and dismissed the SLP. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789779