<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment requires information suggesting escapement of income and cannot rest on a mere change of opinion. The High Court treated the challenge as covered by Bombay High Court rulings in Siemens Financial Services Private Limited and Alok Industries Ltd., and quashed the impugned notices, consequential notices and the assessment order. The Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with that order and dismissed the SLP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment requires information suggesting escapement of income and cannot rest on a mere change of opinion. The High Court treated the challenge as covered by Bombay High Court rulings in Siemens Financial Services Private Limited and Alok Industries Ltd., and quashed the impugned notices, consequential notices and the assessment order. The Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with that order and dismissed the SLP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>