<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment requires information suggesting income escapement and cannot rest merely on a change of opinion. Reassessment notices, consequential notices and the assessment order were quashed where the issue was covered by earlier rulings on this requirement. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s decision, leaving the quashing of the reassessment proceedings intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment requires information suggesting income escapement and cannot rest merely on a change of opinion. Reassessment notices, consequential notices and the assessment order were quashed where the issue was covered by earlier rulings on this requirement. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s decision, leaving the quashing of the reassessment proceedings intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>