<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
    <description>Reopening of assessment on a mere change of opinion requires information suggesting escapement of income. The note records that the High Court treated the challenge as covered by Siemens Financial Services and Alok Industries, and on that basis quashed the impugned notices, consequential notices and assessment order. It further records that the Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order and dismissed the SLP.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 849 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</link>
      <description>Reopening of assessment on a mere change of opinion requires information suggesting escapement of income. The note records that the High Court treated the challenge as covered by Siemens Financial Services and Alok Industries, and on that basis quashed the impugned notices, consequential notices and assessment order. It further records that the Supreme Court found no ground to interfere with the High Court&#039;s order and dismissed the SLP.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>