https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined where detention of goods and vehicle under GST law showed a prima facie contravention, including transport in a direction opposite to the declared destination. The Court treated the petitioner's denial of ownership and the allegation of coercion in recording the statement as factual disputes requiring detailed investigation, which could not be resolved in writ proceedings. It also noted that the detention order was stated to have been affixed on the vehicle and that statutory remedies remained available. On that basis, no immediate direction for release of the consignment or conveyance was granted. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jun 2026 15:51:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined where detention of goods and vehicle under GST law showed a prima facie contravention, including transport in a direction opposite to the declared destination. The Court treated the petitioner's denial of ownership and the allegation of coercion in recording the statement as factual disputes requiring detailed investigation, which could not be resolved in writ proceedings. It also noted that the detention order was stated to have been affixed on the vehicle and that statutory remedies remained available. On that basis, no immediate direction for release of the consignment or conveyance was granted. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782