https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782 GST detention of goods and conveyance was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the record showed a prima facie basis for proceedings, including interception of the vehicle away from the declared destination and inconsistencies in the supporting invoices and stated transactions. Allegations that the petitioner's statement was coerced raised disputed questions of fact that could not be resolved on writ review, especially where summons had been issued and service attempts were recorded before the statement was taken. The detention order and extension of inspection time were treated as procedurally supported on the record, and immediate release of the goods and vehicle was not justified. The writ challenge therefore failed, leaving the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies. en-us Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782 GST detention of goods and conveyance was not interfered with in writ jurisdiction where the record showed a prima facie basis for proceedings, including interception of the vehicle away from the declared destination and inconsistencies in the supporting invoices and stated transactions. Allegations that the petitioner's statement was coerced raised disputed questions of fact that could not be resolved on writ review, especially where summons had been issued and service attempts were recorded before the statement was taken. The detention order and extension of inspection time were treated as procedurally supported on the record, and immediate release of the goods and vehicle was not justified. The writ challenge therefore failed, leaving the petitioner to pursue statutory remedies. Case-Laws GST Mon, 02 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789782