<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 50CA share valuation must follow Rule 11UAA and Rule 11UA(1); CA valuation sustained, addition deleted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98783</link>
    <description>For section 50CA, valuation of unquoted equity shares must follow Rule 11UAA read with Rule 11UA(1), and the Assessing Officer could not insist on a merchant banker report by importing the regime meant for section 56(2)(viib). The assessee&#039;s Chartered Accountant valuation under the Net Asset Value method showed a fair market value below the actual sale price, so the declared consideration could not be substituted merely because fresh shares had earlier been issued to the same buyer at a higher price. The ITAT upheld deletion of the addition, finding no basis for an adjustment under section 50CA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 50CA share valuation must follow Rule 11UAA and Rule 11UA(1); CA valuation sustained, addition deleted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98783</link>
      <description>For section 50CA, valuation of unquoted equity shares must follow Rule 11UAA read with Rule 11UA(1), and the Assessing Officer could not insist on a merchant banker report by importing the regime meant for section 56(2)(viib). The assessee&#039;s Chartered Accountant valuation under the Net Asset Value method showed a fair market value below the actual sale price, so the declared consideration could not be substituted merely because fresh shares had earlier been issued to the same buyer at a higher price. The ITAT upheld deletion of the addition, finding no basis for an adjustment under section 50CA.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 08:03:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=98783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>