<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 207 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51179</link>
    <description>For non-notified ball bearings, the Revenue must prove the smuggled character before confiscation or penalty can stand under the Customs Act. Allegations that supplier firms were fictitious, or that purchase bills were false, may raise suspicion but do not by themselves discharge that burden. In the absence of independent evidence of contraband import or other material linking the goods to smuggling, confiscation and penalty are not justified and are set aside in favour of the importer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:49:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 207 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51179</link>
      <description>For non-notified ball bearings, the Revenue must prove the smuggled character before confiscation or penalty can stand under the Customs Act. Allegations that supplier firms were fictitious, or that purchase bills were false, may raise suspicion but do not by themselves discharge that burden. In the absence of independent evidence of contraband import or other material linking the goods to smuggling, confiscation and penalty are not justified and are set aside in favour of the importer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>