<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (5) TMI 1694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468027</link>
    <description>Impugned notices and assessment-related orders were held unsustainable because the controversy was already covered by prior decisions on the same issue. The parties accepted that the petition for Assessment Year 2016-17 fell within those earlier rulings, and the Court granted relief accordingly. As a result, the notices, assessment order and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 21:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (5) TMI 1694 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468027</link>
      <description>Impugned notices and assessment-related orders were held unsustainable because the controversy was already covered by prior decisions on the same issue. The parties accepted that the petition for Assessment Year 2016-17 fell within those earlier rulings, and the Court granted relief accordingly. As a result, the notices, assessment order and all consequential proceedings were quashed and set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>