<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 752 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789683</link>
    <description>Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act is described as conferring a special, overriding power to frame a banking amalgamation or reconstruction scheme in public interest, with judicial review restrained absent arbitrariness, mala fides or patent illegality. The text also explains that depositor-based classifications, including separate treatment of retail and institutional depositors and staggered repayment with reduced post-appointed-date interest, may be justified where they rationally support depositor protection and banking stability. It further notes that consultation-based objections, shareholder-approval arguments, and challenges relating to deposit insurance and related liabilities are assessed against the statutory procedure and the scheme&#039;s operative framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:52:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 752 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789683</link>
      <description>Section 45 of the Banking Regulation Act is described as conferring a special, overriding power to frame a banking amalgamation or reconstruction scheme in public interest, with judicial review restrained absent arbitrariness, mala fides or patent illegality. The text also explains that depositor-based classifications, including separate treatment of retail and institutional depositors and staggered repayment with reduced post-appointed-date interest, may be justified where they rationally support depositor protection and banking stability. It further notes that consultation-based objections, shareholder-approval arguments, and challenges relating to deposit insurance and related liabilities are assessed against the statutory procedure and the scheme&#039;s operative framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>