https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684 Interlocutory arbitral orders permitting a trustee-capacity claimant to participate as co-claimant may remain insulated from challenge under Section 37 where the claimant's underlying partnership status is reserved for final determination. LLP law recognises individuals and body corporates as partners, while beneficial interests settled in trust may raise separate questions regarding the legal holder of an LLP share. Interference requires jurisdictional error, perversity, or patent illegality; delay and intervening proceedings may also weigh against intervention. The trustee's participation was sustained without deciding the substantive partnership-status issue. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:52:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684 Interlocutory arbitral orders permitting a trustee-capacity claimant to participate as co-claimant may remain insulated from challenge under Section 37 where the claimant's underlying partnership status is reserved for final determination. LLP law recognises individuals and body corporates as partners, while beneficial interests settled in trust may raise separate questions regarding the legal holder of an LLP share. Interference requires jurisdictional error, perversity, or patent illegality; delay and intervening proceedings may also weigh against intervention. The trustee's participation was sustained without deciding the substantive partnership-status issue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684