https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684 A challenge to an arbitral impleadment order under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was treated as unmeritorious because the Tribunal had only permitted a trustee-capacity claimant to participate while keeping the underlying partnership-status question open for final determination. The note states that, on the facts, the LLP framework recognises only individuals or body corporates as partners, but the Tribunal acted cautiously and did not finally decide cessation of partnership. It further records that no jurisdictional error, perversity, or patent illegality was shown, and the challenge was also affected by delay and intervening proceedings. The arbitral order was therefore sustained. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:52:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684 A challenge to an arbitral impleadment order under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was treated as unmeritorious because the Tribunal had only permitted a trustee-capacity claimant to participate while keeping the underlying partnership-status question open for final determination. The note states that, on the facts, the LLP framework recognises only individuals or body corporates as partners, but the Tribunal acted cautiously and did not finally decide cessation of partnership. It further records that no jurisdictional error, perversity, or patent illegality was shown, and the challenge was also affected by delay and intervening proceedings. The arbitral order was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789684