<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (4) TMI 754 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789685</link>
    <description>Bought-out items such as hoods, chimneys, ovens, microwaves and fittings supplied from the head office and installed at customer sites were held not includible in the assessable value of modular kitchen systems where they were not shown to be manufactured by the assessee or to be essential parts of the excisable goods. The extended period of limitation was also found unavailable because the assessee was registered, regularly filing returns, and the dispute arose from an interpretative issue rather than suppression or wilful intent to evade duty. On both merits and limitation, the demand failed and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 07:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=896485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (4) TMI 754 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789685</link>
      <description>Bought-out items such as hoods, chimneys, ovens, microwaves and fittings supplied from the head office and installed at customer sites were held not includible in the assessable value of modular kitchen systems where they were not shown to be manufactured by the assessee or to be essential parts of the excisable goods. The extended period of limitation was also found unavailable because the assessee was registered, regularly filing returns, and the dispute arose from an interpretative issue rather than suppression or wilful intent to evade duty. On both merits and limitation, the demand failed and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=789685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>